by Kevin McCullough
There she was in a moment of serious, genuine indignation.
Rachel Maddow on MSNBC this last week bemoaning the "horrific reality" that not only were abortions NOT being performed in south central Kansas since the death of George Tiller, abortion practitioner, but that pro-life protesters had the nerve to go to the home of the woman and hold signs in silence encouraging her to not open up her new practice.
The sin these people had committed was the brute, horrific, intimidation that their mere presence would signal to any and all who sought the opportunity to kill children while still preborn.
I wonder what Ms. Maddow believes about the rent-a-mobs that President Obama had bussed to Madison, Wisconsin this week.
Late on Friday the news cycle was abuzz that both President Obama's campaign organization as well as the Democratic National Committee were both utilizing significant resources to bring tens of thousands of out-of-state protesters to march on the capital grounds in Madison, Wisconsin to interfere in what amounts to a state matter. Some of those protestors were dispatched to the private home of the Wisconsin Governor. Others to the homes of Republican state legislators.
To be specific the protesters were objecting to ending the ability for union leadership to stifle the attempts for the state to work alongside the union to achieve extremely modest compromises, so that no state workers would lose their job.
What was the Governor asking the state employees to give up? A little bit of money.
How little? 5% towards retirement pensions and 12% towards health care coverage.
In other words the state of Wisconsin was still willing to guarantee 95% of the pension, and 88% of the health care costs for state employees, and in doing so would be able to keep all current state employees, in a word, employed.
In New York City, Mayor Bloomberg has been unable to get local teachers' unions to make similar compromises and on Friday announced the city would be slashing the employee count by thousands. Ohio, California, New York, New Jersey and other states all face similar dilemmas.
But let's understand this clearly. A governor of a state, who was elected on a promise of trying to bring fiscal discipline to a state budget process, asks for small sacrifices while still guaranteeing full employment and between 88%-95% of the original benefits promised, is being protested--by largely protestors who were bussed in by the president and all parties who are loyal to him.
Hey - it's Chicago brute politics at its best!
Showing posts with label Kevin McCullough. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kevin McCullough. Show all posts
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Thursday, August 6, 2009
President Obama: Americans Spy On Americans
FOX NEWS
By Kevin McCullough
What concern is it to the president or his administration if private citizens have disagreements, discussions, and dissections of his proposed take over of the health care industry?
So what has the White House told supporters to do when you run across those who spread “disinformation” about the new attempt by the Obama administration to install the anti-competitive practices of a “public option” into a federalized universal health care initiative?
Report them.
Whether its communicated through e-mail, web sites, blogs, or even casual conversation the executive branch of the federal government is asking you to make them aware of this “disinformation” because they can’t keep track of all of the dissenters themselves.
From Tuesday’s White House blog entry:
There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain e-mails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an e-mail or see something on the Web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov.
Pardon me for asking such an obvious question, but what concern is it to the president or his administration if private citizens have disagreements, discussions, and dissections of his proposed take over of the health care industry?
Last I checked I had the constitutional right to do so.
But now he wishes to turn one citizen against another?
At dozens of the town hall meetings taking place back in individual districts this month, numbers of reports have surfaced that ACORN members have taken to publicly berating normal citizens who are simply there to ask the questions they have about the viability of a plan that requires the government to spend an additional $1,000,000,000 dollars. They wonder this especially when 85% of people in America are satisfied and content with the health insurance system they’ve already chosen to engage.
So what’s the answer to good old fashioned grass roots voters actually being engaged with their representatives in Congress while they’re home during the August break?
The White House believes it’s best to intimidate and silence, or at the bare minimum — report.
The mistake this White House continues to make, seemingly on a daily basis, is that they reveal very much what they truly think of freedoms of the American political process.
Being generous, we can conclude it’s not a very high opinion.
When President George W. Bush was being stalked by Cindy Sheehan and Code Pink on a daily basis, over a genuine issue of national security — the War on Terror — he met with Sheehan, acknowledged her pain, and wished her well, all while respectfully disagreeing with her over the policy.
By contrast, when more than 2,800 tea parties took place on April 15 and more than 1.5 million people turned out, President Obama showed these folks the back of his hand and insisted on marginalizing those who sought his attention on a fundamental issue of his job performance.
And now he’s asking you to report those who disagree with him to his newly crafted e-mail address.
There could likely be many good reasons for the White House to set up an e-mail address “flag@whitehouse.gov.” — Like reporting a suspicious truck parked in a place it’s not supposed to be. Or the systematic movement of people that seek to attack the nation. Or even a suspicious piece of baggage that should not be left unaccompanied.
But reporting your neighbors for simply disagreeing on the unknown outcomes of a federally controlled, centralized universal governmental control of health care is not an acceptable use of such an effort.
Perhaps it would be different if we felt the administration was dealing with us honestly. At this point, they’ve all but admitted that they will have to raise taxes on the middle class. That cheery news, coupled with catching significant personalities on video–i.e. Barney Frank, Jan Schikowski, and President Obama — all opining about their desire for a new “public option” to lead to a single payer system, gives the nation pause and little confidence to think that what the president says at prime time press conferences is genuine.
So what should our response be?
Greater demands for free speech…
Louder volumes at town hall meetings…
Bigger belligerence the tighter they squeeze…
In short, when free speech is threatened, screeching screams of volition are the only thing preventing the mandated, manhandled, chokehold of silence.
So go ahead… report me… I will shout louder!
Kevin McCullough is the nationally syndicated host of “‘Xtreme’ Radio” now heard on 197 stations and columnist based in New York. He blogs at www.muscleheadrevolution.com. His second book “The Kind Of MAN Every Man SHOULD Be” is in stores now.
Source: Fox News
Editor’s Note: We would like to know what you think? dan@goldcoastchronicle.com
By Kevin McCullough
What concern is it to the president or his administration if private citizens have disagreements, discussions, and dissections of his proposed take over of the health care industry?
So what has the White House told supporters to do when you run across those who spread “disinformation” about the new attempt by the Obama administration to install the anti-competitive practices of a “public option” into a federalized universal health care initiative?
Report them.
Whether its communicated through e-mail, web sites, blogs, or even casual conversation the executive branch of the federal government is asking you to make them aware of this “disinformation” because they can’t keep track of all of the dissenters themselves.
From Tuesday’s White House blog entry:
There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain e-mails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an e-mail or see something on the Web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov.
Pardon me for asking such an obvious question, but what concern is it to the president or his administration if private citizens have disagreements, discussions, and dissections of his proposed take over of the health care industry?
Last I checked I had the constitutional right to do so.
But now he wishes to turn one citizen against another?
At dozens of the town hall meetings taking place back in individual districts this month, numbers of reports have surfaced that ACORN members have taken to publicly berating normal citizens who are simply there to ask the questions they have about the viability of a plan that requires the government to spend an additional $1,000,000,000 dollars. They wonder this especially when 85% of people in America are satisfied and content with the health insurance system they’ve already chosen to engage.
So what’s the answer to good old fashioned grass roots voters actually being engaged with their representatives in Congress while they’re home during the August break?
The White House believes it’s best to intimidate and silence, or at the bare minimum — report.
The mistake this White House continues to make, seemingly on a daily basis, is that they reveal very much what they truly think of freedoms of the American political process.
Being generous, we can conclude it’s not a very high opinion.
When President George W. Bush was being stalked by Cindy Sheehan and Code Pink on a daily basis, over a genuine issue of national security — the War on Terror — he met with Sheehan, acknowledged her pain, and wished her well, all while respectfully disagreeing with her over the policy.
By contrast, when more than 2,800 tea parties took place on April 15 and more than 1.5 million people turned out, President Obama showed these folks the back of his hand and insisted on marginalizing those who sought his attention on a fundamental issue of his job performance.
And now he’s asking you to report those who disagree with him to his newly crafted e-mail address.
There could likely be many good reasons for the White House to set up an e-mail address “flag@whitehouse.gov.” — Like reporting a suspicious truck parked in a place it’s not supposed to be. Or the systematic movement of people that seek to attack the nation. Or even a suspicious piece of baggage that should not be left unaccompanied.
But reporting your neighbors for simply disagreeing on the unknown outcomes of a federally controlled, centralized universal governmental control of health care is not an acceptable use of such an effort.
Perhaps it would be different if we felt the administration was dealing with us honestly. At this point, they’ve all but admitted that they will have to raise taxes on the middle class. That cheery news, coupled with catching significant personalities on video–i.e. Barney Frank, Jan Schikowski, and President Obama — all opining about their desire for a new “public option” to lead to a single payer system, gives the nation pause and little confidence to think that what the president says at prime time press conferences is genuine.
So what should our response be?
Greater demands for free speech…
Louder volumes at town hall meetings…
Bigger belligerence the tighter they squeeze…
In short, when free speech is threatened, screeching screams of volition are the only thing preventing the mandated, manhandled, chokehold of silence.
So go ahead… report me… I will shout louder!
Kevin McCullough is the nationally syndicated host of “‘Xtreme’ Radio” now heard on 197 stations and columnist based in New York. He blogs at www.muscleheadrevolution.com. His second book “The Kind Of MAN Every Man SHOULD Be” is in stores now.
Source: Fox News
Editor’s Note: We would like to know what you think? dan@goldcoastchronicle.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)