Friday, December 2, 2011

Pastors charged after telling 'gays' about sin

FAITH UNDER FIRE

Now facing bench trial in court run by lesbian


By Bob Unruh © 2011 WND

Two veteran street preachers in Houston are facing a bench trial for spreading the biblical message about homosexuality – and other sins – on one of their favorite corners for preaching in Houston.

That the message was direct is obvious, from a photo of the situation that developed for David Stokes of BulldogMinistries.com and Dave Allen of HornofSamuelBook.com:


Street preachers with shofar, sign that prompted tickets

Their sign warns those who are "Drunks, homosexuals, abortionist, adulterers, liars, fornicators, thieves, atheists, witches, idolators" that "Hell awaits you."

What should America really be like? Find out in the instructions, "The Constitution of the United States"

Their hearing will be in Houston Municipal Court, which is run by Barbara E. Hartle, who, according to the Dallas Voice, is listed by the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund as "one of only a few out members of the Texas judiciary."

She was appointed to the position by Houston Mayor Annise Parker, identified by the Los Angeles Times as "the first lesbian to head a major American city."

Allen told WND that no matter what happens, the fact that the ministers were handcuffed and ticketed, with their signs and shofar confiscated for a time, sent a chilling message about free speech regarding religion and homosexuality.

Technically, they were ticketed for having signs thicker than one-quarter inch (they say they were 3/16ths and that they'd been approved beforehand), and for having a sign not made out of wood (their shofar is a ram's horn style).

Officers responded after someone apparently complained about the messengers and their message, but a video reveals that the first officer on the scene told them they weren't doing anything wrong.

It was a few minutes later, however, when officers approached the preachers, apparently grabbed a video camera, wrestled them to the ground and put them in handcuffs.

That's even though Stokes and Allan have been preaching at that location for several years.

The video:

The video recording shows that the officers discussed the situation with each other, saying, "They can be out there all they want," and "There was no problem, but we have to do a report on this guy."

There's also a reference to "one way to get rid of them," coupled with a muffled statement that appears to say, "Seize the signs."

The ministers reported on a YouTube video description that that "police officer admits to trying to take the signs away in order to get us to leave the corner."

To Allen, that sounds like a First Amendment speech infringement.

"We have been preaching on this corner with these same signs for two years," he says in the YouTube introduction.

A local television station also reported on the developing controversy:

Video | News | Weather | Sports

Wed Nov 02 19:02:09 PDT 2011

Street preachers say HPD officers harassed, detained them

Street preachers with an anti-gay message claim police manhandled them and have the video they say proves it. view full article

Allen told WND he blows the shofar and others preach to passersby because of the Old Testament warning that those who know the truth of God's will and don't deliver it to others will bear the responsibility of that failure.

Allen told WND the ministries largely have had a reasonable relationship with the Houston Police Department, but this incident seemed to be reaching for the men in blue.

He said he couldn't speculate on what impact the ministries' message of biblical condemnation for homosexuality may have on the outcome of their case.

"Preaching is all we were doing," he said. "Against all sins."


Read more: Pastors charged after telling 'gays' about sin http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373377#ixzz1fO8jvbZn

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Congressional staff gives Constitution new meaning

CERTIFIGATE

Researchers target 'eligibility,' say 'native born' really is 'natural born'


By Bob Unruh

© 2011 WND


Barack Obama

The Congressional Research Service, the research arm of Congress, has launched a defense of Barack Obama's presidential eligibility with a 50-page report that "Where's the Birth Certificate?" author Jerome Corsi has described as a "polemic aimed at convincing readers" Obama meets the requirements to be president.

Shortly after Obama took office, it was CRS staffer Jerry W. Mansfield, an information research specialist in the Knowledge Services Group, who wrote a memo titled "Qualifications of Barack Obama to Be President of the United States" that seemed aimed at providing talking points for members of Congress whose constituents who were questioning the absence of documentation for Obama.

Now comes the new campaign from CRS Legislative Attorney Jack Maskell, which seems to redefine eligibility, equating "native born" with the constitutional "natural born" citizen.

He cites the questions that have plagued Obama from before his 2008 election – the location of his birth and the status of his parents. The Constitution requires a president to be a "natural born citizen," and a common definition at the time the Constitution was written was an offspring of two citizen parents.

While Obama has released a purported "Certificate of Live Birth" from Hawaii, there are experts who have questioned whether it is genuine. Others say even if he was born in Hawaii, he would not be eligible because his father was a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of the birth. They argue the inclusion of "natural born" in the Constitution precluded dual citizens from occupying the Oval Office.

Get the latest details on the jarring facts about Barack Obama and his past. Jerome Corsi's e-book, "Where's the Real Birth Certificate?" demonstrates conclusively that no legal authority has ever verified Obama's legal eligibility to be president, that glaring inconsistencies, blackouts, and outright fabrications in his life narrative have generated widespread doubts, and that, in fact, a compelling body of evidence says Obama is not a natural-born citizen as is required of all presidents by Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution."

The definition of the status was addressed in 1875 in the U.S. Supreme Court decision Minor v. Happersett, which concluded it was a child born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of location of the birth.

That decision said: "The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."

(Story continues below)




The current Supreme Court has avoided addressing the question directly, according to one of its members, by refusing to hear any of the dozens of cases that have been brought specifically on the question of the application of "natural born citizen" to a child whose father was a foreign national, whether he was born on U.S. soil or not.

But Maskell states that "the Supreme Court has never needed to address this particular issue within the specific context of a challenge to the eligibility of a candidate under Article II, Section 1, clause 5, the only place in the entire Constitution that the phrase appears."

He said that because the Supreme Court "has never needed to address this particular issue," there is "certain speculation on the scope of the language."

Corsi notes that Maskell simply advances the argument that "native born" is equivalent to "natural born" and that "being a 'U.S. citizen at birth' is equivalent to 'natural born citizen.'"

"The end result of Maskell's analysis is that an anchor baby born to two illegal immigrants, or a baby born in 'birth tourism' to two foreign national parents and raised outside the United States would both be eligible to be president, provided the person was 35 years old and had spent 14 years as a resident living within the United States before running for president," Corsi writes.

"Maskell typically states as established fact legal principles that truthfully remain in dispute, for instance, on page 1 of the report, where he asserts that a person born 'in' the United States of one or more alien parents is 'clearly a U.S. citizen 'at birth' by the Fourteenth Amendment,'" Corsi continues.

"In so concluding, Maskell intentionally ignores the 'and subject to the jurisdiction thereof' qualification with the language of the Fourteenth Amendment that opponents to anchor babies and birth tourism feel invalidates the entire concept that being born in the U.S. is sufficient to being deemed a 'U.S. citizen at birth,'" he says.

Corsi continues, "Similarly, Maskell wants to read English Common Law into the 'natural born citizen' requirement of Article 2, Section 1, because under English Common Law a 'natural born subject' is anyone born on English soil, a principle known as jus soli – a right conferred by place of birth – rather than jus sanguinis – a right conferred by blood, requiring an inquiry into the citizenship of the parents when a child is born."

He notes that Maskell, "in his pro-Obama advocacy," asserted the two-citizen parent requirement would "entail the unique notion that under American jurisprudence parental citizenship or lineage is the determining factor for eligibility to the presidency for native born U.S. citizens."

"In so doing, Maskell failed to acknowledge the concern the Founders had when inserting into the Constitution the 'natural born citizen' requirement that being a citizen was not sufficient for a person to ascend to the presidency," Corsi says.

Maskell argues that "natural born" citizens probably were considered by the early members of Congress "to include more than merely the 'native born,' that is, those born in the country."

And he notes at the time of the Dredd Scott decision by the U.S. Supreme Court affirming slavery, the U.S. attorney general wrote, "I am quite clear in the opinion that children born in the United States of alien parents, who have never been naturalized, are native-born citizens of the United States, and, of course, do not require the formality of naturalization to entitle them to the rights and privileges of such citizenship."

The Constitution, however, requires "natural born," not only "native born."

That's no problem, Maskell said, as various commentators, such as James Kent in his "Commentaries on American Law," equated the two terms.

And he said the U.S. Supreme Court did the same thing in an opinion, quoting, "We start with the premise that the rights of citizenship of the native born and of the naturalized person are of the same dignity and are coextensive. The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the 'natural born' citizen is eligible to be president."

In Obama's case, he says, "there is currently no requirement under federal law … for any federal candidate, that is, candidates to the U.S. Senate, the House of Representatives, of the office of president, to publish, produce, or release an official 'birth certificate.'"

He writes, "The initial burden of proof is always upon those who challenge a candidate's eligibility, and not on a candidate to 'prove' eligibility."

He continues by noting that "no official record" … is around that places "President Obama's mother in a foreign country at the time of the president's birth."

He also moves on to arguments that are thin, Corsi says, quoting the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in the Kerchner v. Obama eligibility case that "because we have decided that this appeal is frivolous, we will order counsel for appellants to show cause why just damages and costs should not be imposed."

However, in that case, when the Kerchner side pointed out that under the rules of the court, a threat of sanctions comes with a right to discovery regarding the allegations, the court retreated from its position.

That also happened in a previous case involving Gregory S. Hollister, who brought a challenge to Obama's eligibility. A threat of sanctions was met with approval by Hollister's attorney, because then he would have the right of discovery. Again, the court retreated.

Concludes Maskell, "Every child born in and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States … is a native born U.S. citizen and thus a 'natural born citizen' eligible to be president … regardless of the nationality or citizenship of one's parents."

However, Maskell makes no reference to an effort by a Chicago firm led by an Obama fundraiser to remove the "natural born citizen" requirement from the U.S. Constitution – a move that seems to betray doubt about Obama's eligibility.

The article in 2006 by Sarah Herlihy stated: "The natural born citizen requirement in Article II of the United States Constitution has been called the 'stupidest provision' in the Constitution, 'decidedly un-American,' 'blatantly discriminatory,' and the 'Constitution's worst provision.'"

She said "emotional" reasons were defeating attempts by "rational" arguments to remove it.

She was listed as an associate at the Chicago firm Kirkland & Ellis, where partner Bruce I. Ettelson cited his membership on the finance committee for Obama. Her writings were available online under law review articles from Kent University until after WND reported on the statements.

In the earlier memo by Mansfield, posted on Scribd.com for download, he suggested questions raised about Obama's eligibility have been conclusively dismissed as Internet falsehoods that are taking on mythical proportions.

Mansfield told WND that he had written the memo to give to congressional constituents who were peppering congressional offices for a response to eligibility challenges.

WND also has reported that there have been at least eight attempts by members of Congress, during the past few years as Obama was developing his power base and running for president, to remove the Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural born citizen."

Read more: Congressional staff gives Constitution new meaning http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=373085#ixzz1fQmiZphg

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

See anti-Obama ads spiked by major networks – even Fox!

MEDIA MATTERS

'Representation of public figures is something we try to avoid'


By Jerome R. Corsi

© 2011 WND



Screenshot of ad with animations of Pat Boone, President Obama and Ben Bernanke

Two television spots developed by a national investment firm specializing in U.S. gold and silver coins have been rejected by major television networks, including the Fox News Channel and the Fox Business Network, for apparently political reasons.

The ads by Phoenix-based Swiss America Trading Corp., a WND advertiser, feature President Obama and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke as animated characters engaging in the potentially inflationary policy of printing paper money with abandon to stimulate the struggling economy.

Singer Pat Boone, a spokesman for Swiss America for more than 15 years, appears in the commercials as an animated announcer who concludes that investing in gold is a prudent strategy to diversify a portfolio in inflationary times.

"The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve"

Swiss America CEO Craig Smith said the intent of the ads was not to make a political statement.

The goal, he said, "was to take what we thought was a humorous approach to a timely and important economic topic in order to advertise our company and promote a new book we've recently published."

Along with Fox News and Fox Business, the two commercials have been rejected by NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, ABC, CBS, CNN/HLN and the Discovery Channel.

Comcast, in rejecting the spot, told Swiss America that it "does not meet our standards on public symbol."


Comcast's Public Symbol Policy specifies that the "use of the name or likeness of the President of the United States and/or the Presidential Seal for endorsing commercial purposes must be authorized by the White House."

Fox News said the "representation of public figures is something we try to avoid."

CNN/HLN told Swiss America the commercials were "not appropriate for the current landscape."

"The networks' reaction shocked me," Smith said. "It's a threat to First Amendment rights when a commercial message is rejected not because it is inaccurate or misleading, but because it makes what is perceived to be a political statement the networks want to avoid."

Smith told WND he was concerned that the networks were protecting Obama and Bernanke.

"All we are saying in these two commercials is what dozens of responsible professional economists are saying every day," Smith said. "Gold investment as a responsible diversification strategy when governments printing of fiat currencies with abandon risk unleashing inflationary principles."

Only Google TV accepted the commercials, for broadcast on the DISH Network and Direct TV satellite networks.

Google TV has planned a test in which the two ads will be broadcast 1,132 times on the DISH Network and Direct TV from Dec. 5, 2011, through Jan. 12, 2012.

Ironically, the Swiss America ads will be seen nationally via Google TV on many of the major networks that have refused to air them. While cable subscribers to Fox News and CNN/HLN will not see the ads, for example, subscribers to the DISH Network or Direct TV will see them on those networks during the test period.

"The silver lining," said Smith "is that many of the television and cable networks who told us 'no' have come back saying 'yes' to Google TV, which will begin broadcasting the two commercials next week. We are very thankful to Google TV for helping us keep free speech alive on the television airwaves."

In June, Smith and co-author Lowell Ponte published "The Inflation Deception: Six Ways Government Tricks Us … and Seven Ways to Stop It!" in a paperback edition.

"Welcome to the 'inflatocracy' – our new form of government of, by, and for inflation – in which deliberately debasing our money has become a tool of mind manipulation, wealth distribution, and secret taxation," the publicity for the book on Amazon.com reads.

The first Swiss America commercial, seen below, plays off the theme "Helicopter Ben," a nickname Wall Street has conferred upon Bernanke for his reputation of "helicoptering" into financial crises to dump money on a problem.

The second Swiss America commercial, seen below, evokes imagery from the classic movie "The Wizard of Oz" to portray Bernanke and Obama as "financial wizards" hiding as "the men behind the door" in an inflationary scheme to solve economic problems by printing money.

Ray Griggs, the producer of the 2010 feature film documentary "I Want Your Money," a critical examination of the Obama administration's economic policies, produced the two Swiss America commercials.


Read more: See anti-Obama ads spiked by major networks – even Fox! http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=372421#ixzz1fIOt5eas

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Obama pastor offers sanctuary for rioters

OCCUPY THIS!

Obama pastor offers sanctuary for rioters

Calls on churches nationwide to open 'basements and halls'


Posted: November 17, 2011
3:27 pm Eastern

By Aaron Klein
© 2011 WND



Jim Wallis

A member of President Obama's controversial faith council has offered his parish as sanctuary to Occupy protesters and has called on churches nationwide to similarly open their doors to activists from the anti-capitalist movement.

"It's time to invite the Occupy Movement to church!" wrote Jim Wallis, founder of Sojourners, a Ministry professing a devotion to the pursuit of "social justice."

Wallis penned an article in his church's magazine, also called Sojourners, calling for a "church sanctuary for the Occupy movement."

Wallis was appointed to in February 2009 to the Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, a White House group replete with advocates for using religion to advance "social justice."

"Red Army: The Radical Network that must be defeated to save America" exposes the extremists behind Occupy Wall Street

Wallis reportedly is a spiritual adviser to Obama and has known the president for years.

Writing in his magazine, Wallis suggested that Thanksgiving is the "perfect occasion" for churches to aid the Occupy movement.

"Open our church basements and parish halls as safe places to sleep — shelter and sanctuary as cold weather descends upon many of our cities," he wrote.

(Story continues below)


"The Occupy movement needs a sanctuary. And what better safe and welcome place could these young people find than with communities of faith?

"As we provide that safe sanctuary for a new generation of protesters who dream of a better world, let us also engage them in the spirituality of the change they seek."

Continued Wallis: "Concentrations of wealth and power, unfairness in our political process, the loss of opportunity – especially for the next generation – and the alarming rise of poverty in the world's richest nation are all fundamental concerns for people of faith.

"So let's invite the young occupiers into our churches and ministries for good conversation and a great meal," he added.

Wallis recommended churches provide turkey dinner to the occupiers, remarking that the protesters are likely sick of pizza.

He blasted New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg for clearing out Zuccotti Park of protesters earlier this week.

"Bloomberg is the poster child for the '1 percent,''' wrote Wallis. "He is the archetypal wealthy man who bought political power, and the uprising in his city to challenge what he himself stands for has made the mayor uncomfortable about the protests since the beginning."

Obama's controversial pastor

Wallis is a socialist activist who has championed communist causes and previously labeled the U.S. "the great captor and destroyer of human life."

The Associated Baptist Press described Wallis as a "politically progressive evangelical and longtime advocate for the poor." The Huffington Post identified him as a "Christian author and social-justice advocate."

Wallis, however, is a longtime socialist advocate whose Sojourners magazine has championed communist causes.

Wallis began his activism as a protester and then later Michigan leader of the Students for a Democratic Society, the 1960s anti-war group from which Bill Ayers' Weather Underground domestic terrorist organization splintered.

Discover the Networks documented that as a theology student, Wallis founded an anti-capitalism magazine called the Post-American, which identified wealth redistribution and government-managed economies as the keys to achieving "social justice."

In 1971, Wallis renamed his magazine Sojourners. He has since served as editor of the publication.

Sojourners' official "statement of faith" urges readers to "refuse to accept [capitalist] structures and assumptions that normalize poverty and segregate the world by class."

Sojourners has published a slew of radicals, including socialist activist Cornel West and James Cone, considered the founder of Black Liberation Theology, which spawned the likes of Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama's pastor of nearly 20 years.

Wallis' magazine actively lobbied for communist regimes that seized power in Latin America in the late 1970s, including the Sandinista dictatorship in Nicaragua. Sojourners in the 1980s was a fierce opponent of the U.S. nuclear buildup, claiming the policy was "an intolerable evil" irreconcilably at odds with Christianity.

Discover the Networks notes how Sojourners originally formed a socialist commune in Washington, D.C., where members shared finances and launched anti-capitalist activism.

In his 1976 book, "Agenda for Biblical People," Wallis called the U.S. "the great power, the great seducer, the great captor and destroyer of human life, the great master of humanity and history in its totalitarian claims and designs."

Wallis continues to openly support socialism. Along with socialist activist West, Wallis in 1995 founded Call to Renewal, a coalition of religious groups demanding the spread of U.S. wealth to promote "social justice."

White House pushing churches to be 'green'?

Other members of Obama's faith council write for Wallis' Sojourners magazine.

In January, Obama named to his faith council Lynne Hybels, a leader of Willow Creek Church, an inter-denominational, multi-generational megachurch located in a Chicago suburb.

The church is led by Hybels' husband, Bill, a social justice advocate who created the Global Leadership Summit, an international Christian group.

Lynne Hybels' official title at Willow Creek Church is advocate for global engagement. She is also a regular contributor to Sojourners magazine.

She has advocated for the "greenest" church on the planet, while discussing Scripture as it relates to the Palestinians and calling for a fight against American "racial injustice."

Also writing at Sojourners, as WND reported, is Eboo Patel, another member of the White House faith council.

Patel declared that everything he was taught about Christopher Columbus, Thomas Jefferson and American "fairness" and "equality" was wrong.

WND also reported Patel, a Muslim activist from Chicago, compared al-Qaida to what he called Christian "totalitarians" in the U.S. and Jewish "totalitarians" in Israel.

Earlier, WND reported Patel is deeply tied to Weather Underground founder Ayers. Also, Patel has blasted what he calls the "myths" of America – describing them as beliefs that the country is "a land of freedom and equality and justice."

Obama church sanctuary for draft dodgers

Obama himself is not unfamiliar with churches serving as sanctuary for radical protesters.

As WND previously reported, the Hawaii church where Obama attended Sunday school as a boy, First Unitarian, was a far-left activist congregation that may have helped provide the president's initial political education.

While Obama's membership as an adult in the controversial Trinity United Church of Christ has received widespread media attention, almost nothing has been reported about his Sunday school attendance at the Hawaii church.

First Unitarian, a member of the Unitarian Universalist denomination, served as a sanctuary for draft dodgers and was strongly tied to the Students for a Democratic Society, or SDS, during the time Ayers was a leader in that organization. The Weathermen was an offshoot of the SDS.

Andrew Walden, publisher and editor of the Hawaii Free Press, dug up newspaper clippings from that period as well as print editions of "The Roach," an SDS publication describing the group's draft-dodging activism, including at the Unitarian church.

After living from age 7 with his mother and step-father in Indonesia, where he was enrolled as a Muslim in public schools, Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 11 in 1971 to reside with his grandmother. His mother moved back to Hawaii in 1972 and stayed there until 1977, when she relocated again to Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation.

In his autobiography, "Dreams from My Father," Obama recounts on page 17 moving to Hawaii and being enrolled in the Unitarian church.

When Obama's maternal grandmother died in November 2008, the memorial service, attended by the then-presidential candidate, was held in Honolulu's Unitarian church.

According to an account in the Tampa Tribune, when Obama was reminded at his grandmother's memorial service that he attended the church's Sunday school as a child, his eyes lit up, and he turned to his wife, Michelle, and said, "Hey, that's right. This is where I went to Sunday school."

with research by Brenda J. Elliott


Read more: Obama pastor offers sanctuary for rioters http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=368841#ixzz1e60eGko7

Monday, November 14, 2011

New Interview with Economist Thomas Sowell

If you are on a mobile device or cannot view the images in this message view this email in your web browser.
To ensure future delivery please add HumanEvents@email.humanevents.com to your address book or safe sender's list.
New Interview with
Economist Thomas Sowell

Hello There,

The new Uncommon Knowledge video from our friends at the Hoover Institution is now available.

This week's video features Thomas Sowell, legendary economist and commentator, who has recently published a collection of his greatest works in The Thomas Sowell Reader.

In this brand-new wide-ranging interview, Sowell discusses his most important past achievements, while also offering his take on current affairs. He explains in great detail his early experiences with poverty, his transition from a Marxist to a capitalist, his views of President Obama's policies, and presents a balanced look at the Republican presidential candidates.




Sincerely,

Human Events

Friday, November 11, 2011

Here we are again, the Left exploiting children to push their own convoluted agenda. This time, it's Van Jones using children to push his 10-point "Contract for the American Dream" plan. Ironically, in the video the children plead to increase Social Security taxes so our seniors can have a secure retirement. Too bad Van Jones isn't telling these kids that when they get a job and start paying into the Social Security system, they'll never see a dime of their own money back when they retire.

Points made in the video:

1. Invest in American's Infrastructure

2. Create 21st Century Energy Jobs, We Need More Green Jobs

3. Invest in Public Education

4. Medicare for all, "Let's Expand Medicare"

5. Make Work Pay

6. Secure Social Security: Let's Make Sure Our Seniors Have a Secure Retirement

7. Make the Rich Pay Their Fair Share, End Bush Tax Cuts, New tax bracket for those making more than $1 million

8. Tax Wall Street

9. End Wars

10. Restore, Protect and Renew Democracy by Giving "Immigrants" a Clear Path to Citizenship and by Taking Away Rights of Corporations

Note to Van Jones: The American Dream is not a handout.